Home Blog Page 90

Joan Belmar on his View from the Outside

I have lived in many cultures, but have never felt completely at home in any one. Born in Chile, I moved to Ibiza, Spain at 24, and to the U.S. at 28. In each culture, I have experienced the feelings of an outsider. I have come to understand that “all is not what it seems.” My need to communicate this point of view is what drives my art.

In my recent work, I have created 3-inch thick worlds under glass. At the base of this world is plywood or masonite, on which I have drawn tools, toys, animals, or body parts that can just be detected by looking closely. The surface layer is acetate, on which I often make a geometric pattern or drawing to represent the external, structured, societal world in which everything would seem to have an objective measure and to exist within familiar rules. In between these 3 inches, I use Mylar and acetate to create layers that both expose and obscure the worlds within. Sometimes I use closely separated vertical strips of Mylar that are dyed with diluted acrylic. This heightens the effect I’m looking for, because as the viewer moves from left to right in front of the piece, new things that exist below are revealed and others become partially obscured. Also, the color intensity of the piece varies as you shift from looking at the piece head-on to looking at it from the side. The result I hope for is an organic and mysterious world that is in constant movement, as you shift your viewing position. One image that I have recently used is that of an old bicycle, because it touches upon both our interior and exterior worlds, and it also represents movement and change.

I am fascinated with color and transparency and the compression of worlds that coexist due entirely to the imposition of a technical structure. I think that I create this work as the result of my journey. I think of myself as a collage of experiences and even though many times I do not feel as though I fit in a place, I have access to these experiences.

I do not like to title my works with names that are too descriptive. I think names sometimes narrow the viewer’s focus. I want each viewer to bring their life’s perspectives to the viewing experience, with the hope that each viewer will discover something different.

I love taking advantage of technological changes and contemporary materials. I remember using thin layers of acrylic and oil to create abstract paintings back in 1996 in Spain – a combination of media that was frowned upon at the time – and I have continued to experiment with materials and imagery. I have used all kinds of material (fabrics, papers, plastics, glass, etc) but when I discovered the transparent qualities of acetate and Mylar and the effect of using them in combination, I began to make the dimensional pieces that characterize my current work. They are not exactly painting and not exactly sculpture, another ambiguity that I love.

There are two pieces that have been especially influential in my work: Anish Kapoor’s blue egg and Tara Donovan’s thousands of styrofoam cups. I appreciate the way that Kapoor exploits all the tactile and physical characteristics of materials. He also succeeds in taking the viewer to a different dimension that distorts the senses. As an example, he has placed people playing as children in front of his work; this is done as part of the work itself. Tara Donovan’s work has similar qualities, but she uses disposable materials as glasses, straws, and paper, often in large installations, creating optical illusions that are a challenge to understand. Donovan uses a simple plastic cup to create a world!

I imagine that each of these artists must have a great time in the studio playing and making art from the play. As artists, we face a host of adversities outside our studios, but inside our studios we need to stay very close to our child inside.

Right now I am working on a series of paintings on paper and canvas. In these, the layering is more optical illusion than physical reality. These are a new direction for me and some of them can be seen in my current show at the Neptune Gallery in Bethesda. In the future, I would love to experiment with photography, using light and reflections as new way to create depth.

This month I will open a large exhibition at the Winvian in Litchfield, CT.

Joan Belmar was born in 1970 and grew up 2 hours south of Santiago, Chile. He left Chile for Ibiza, Spain, at the age of 24 where he began painting professionally, using the Catalan “Joan” for his first name, John. He came to Washington, D.C. in 1999, and was granted permanent residency in the U.S. based on extraordinary artistic merit in 2003. Belmar’s work is in the permanent collections of the DCCAH Art Bank, the District of Columbia’s Wilson Building, and the Airport Art Collection, Ibiza Spain. In DC, he has shown in WPA\C venues, the American University Museum ,the Chilean Embassy and the Corcoran Art Auction Gala. He has also shown in Chicago, New York, in Europe (Athens, Barcelona, London, Ibiza, Biella, Lisbon, Sevilla, Santander, Bologna, Malaga, and Rome), in South America (Buenos Aires and Santiago), and in Asia (Seoul). He was a Mayor’s Arts Award Finalist in 2007 as an outstanding emerging artist in Washington, D.C. The DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities and awarded him an artist fellowship grant in 2009 and in 2010, he was awarded an Individual Artist grant by the Maryland Arts Council.

Click here to see the artist’s website.

Editorial assistance on this article provided by Ellyn Weiss

Creating the Temporary by Laurel Lukaszewski

As a sculptor, I work primarily with clay, more specifically porcelain and black stoneware. My interest in clay started in a summer class when I was eleven years old, but the experience was not all positive; that summer I learned to hate the pottery wheel. The kick wheel, made for adults, was for me an exercise in futility. As a result, functional work has held little interest for me. It wasn’t until twelve years later, during a two-year stay in Japan, that I made my peace with the wheel, though I decided that I would leave the exquisite bowl making to more patient people. Separately, it was in high school and college where I learned to dislike glazes almost as much as the wheel. I managed to ruin just about everything I glazed. Despite my dislike of these two relatively fundamental elements of working with clay, I still loved the material and was determined to continue to explore it as a medium.

Over the years I discovered clay bodies that I found beautiful without glaze, being drawn to their way of absorbing or reflecting light, casting shadows, and holding textures. I also became interested in line and form, echoing a lifelong passion for patterns, rhythms and structures found in nature and rooted in my habit of incessant doodling and study of Japanese art and culture in graduate school. Experimentation in the studio led to the discovery that I could create three-dimensional “drawings” that could be built or erased simply by adding or subtracting individual pieces. I also discovered how dynamic the work could be by creating pieces that were assembled in reaction to the space where they were being placed. Often, clay sculpture is limited in size by the capacity of the kiln. It is also an issue that if part of a piece breaks, the whole is basically “ruined.” I found that creating and firing smaller components and assembling them afterward allowed me to create works that had two advantages: I could build works much larger than anything I could create whole in the kiln (my largest piece to date being a 16-foot hanging porcelain sculpture), and if one of the component pieces broke it could simply be replaced without affecting the whole work.

This idea of mutability — that a piece can be assembled, disassembled and reassembled in a new form — has become an important aspect of much of my work. The reality is that if moved, none of these installations can be replicated exactly when reinstalled. On a practical level, this allows me to create a unique piece for each new environment. I am also able to “recycle” the components of one work to create another. On a philosophical level, it helps incorporate my long interest in Japanese aesthetics and cultural concepts.

My recent work has been influenced considerably by the concept “ichi-go ichi-e” (一期一会), originally from the tea ceremony, meaning “one lifetime, one meeting” or “once in a lifetime.” Moving beyond the confines of the teahouse, this idea that an instance or a particular occurrence will only, can only, happen once makes time both special and poignant. It reminds me that no matter how good (or how bad), all is temporary. This idea suits both my abstract works that are assembled for only a short time (say, the duration of a show) and works that are more representational, such as my installations “Sakura” (cherry blossoms) and “Ghost” (leaves). It is with these ideas in mind that I continue to explore the boundaries of what I can create in the studio. Recently, I’ve been on something of a creative tangent, constructing abstracted patterns and textures inspired by shells and barnacles. These are for a show called “The Shell in Nature” this summer on Bainbridge Island outside of Seattle. I will also be showing new work in June at the Athenaeum in Alexandria, VA.

Laurel Lukaszewski is a Washington, DC area based artist who has exhibited widely here as well as in New York, Miami, Palm Beach, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Santa Fe, Seattle, Tulsa and Bainbridge Island. Recent solo exhibitions include ONCE at Project 4 Gallery, Washington, DC, and ARTworks 2009 featuring Laurel Lukaszewski at the Walter Arts Center, Tulsa, OK. Recent group shows include Flora: Growing Inspirations at the United States Botanic Garden in Washington, DC.

Laurel is a founding member of Flux Studios, in Mt. Rainier, MD. and has had residencies at Seattle’s Pottery Northwest and the Holland Hall School in Tulsa, OK. Laurel has served on a number of nonprofit boards including the Washington Sculptors Group, the National Cherry Blossom Festival and the Washington Project for the Arts Artist Council. Laurel holds a B.A. in International Affairs and an M.A. in Asian Studies from Florida State University in Tallahassee, FL.

Her work will be seen in “The Shell in Nature” at The Gallery at Bainbridge Arts & Crafts on Bainbridge Island, WA, from June 4 – June 30, 2010. (http://www.bacart.org/exh-upcoming.html) and in “Of Itself” at the Athenaeum in Alexandria, VA, also this June. You can see more of her work at: www.LaurelLukaszewski.com.

Protecting Artists When Galleries Go Bankrupt – Rob Bettmann

Rob Bettmann recently posted on his blog about the need to change the laws in the District to protect artists when a gallery goes bankrupt. An excerpt:

“A few months ago a staff member for DC Councilmember Cheh suggested I contact Janet Fries, a dc-based lawyer. He mentioned that Janet had been reviewing the DC Bar materials relevant to the arts, and had found that there was a hole in the code regarding gallery transactions. I had no idea what he was talking about, but I followed up with Janet and she explained it to me. I brought the issue to the DC Advocates for the Arts board, and with Janet’s help we’ve created a petition asking the council to address our specific concerns.

DC needs to amend the Commercial Code so that artists’ property isn’t taken by creditors if a gallery goes through bankruptcy. When they overhauled the business laws a few years ago they stripped out sections governing consignment transactions — which is what it is when an artist gives their work under contract to a gallery. There is no lose in this for anyone. We know with community support we can get this done. If you haven’t signed the petition yet, please click here and sign now!”

To see the whole post with the live link to the petition, click here.

Why Should the Government Support the Arts?

State governments across the country are experiencing growing deficits, and government art programs are threatened. In poor economic climates, the arts are unfortunately often the first aspects of society that lose crucial funding. I wrote to artists and non-artists to ask the question: why should our government support the arts?

My hope in placing these voices side by side is to foster understanding between those directly and those indirectly engaged in the arts. Over the next few weeks I’ll be updating this post with links to additional responses. Please weigh in on the conversation that these contributors have begun. I hope that this dialogue will continue in order to sustain an arts community that both enhances art and strengthens our nation.

– Kathryn Boland, Editorial Intern, Bourgeon

1. Ed Lazere, Policy Director, DC Fiscal Policy Institute
2. Andy Shallal, Visual Artist and Founder, Busboys and Poets
3. Maida Withers, Choreographer and Professor
4. Jon Gann, film-maker, and founder of DC Shorts, and DC Film
5. Clark Ray, candidate for DC City Council

Kathryn Boland is a junior at the George Washington University majoring in Dance. She is also minoring in Art History, Theater, and English. She is originally from Newport, Rhode Island. She is fascinated with anything and everything artistic. She is therefore pleased to contribute to dialogue around the arts through interning with Bourgeon.

Blair Murphy talks with Chajana denHarder about Oneness, Shock and Return

Curator (and Bourgeon Associate Editor) Blair Murphy interviewed Chajana denHarder about the artist’s upcoming show at the WPA, Oneness, Shock and Return, on her blog. An excerpt:

“The work itself defies easy categorization, involving performances that occur without an audience, photographs that depict imagined sculptures and finally, the metaphoric consumption of the artist herself. The final images are a documentation of denHarder’s stated desire to merge with her surroundings, just as the ritualistic consumption of the bread invites onlookers to merge with the artist. At the same time, the work ultimately testifies to the stubborn persistence of boundaries, our inability to be at one with either our surroundings or one another in anything but the most fleeting and symbolic of ways.

I spoke with denHarder this week, as she prepared to install the show and put the final touches on her bread alter ego. The show opens this Friday, May 7 from 6-8pm, with an artist’s talk and consumption of the artist/ bread at 7pm. The exhibition will remain on view at WPA headquarters through June 4.

Blair: To start off, can you talk a little bit about the process of creating the work for this particular show? The movement, from performance to digital sculpture to photographs reinstalled in the gallery seems especially important, so I was hoping you could talk a little bit about those processes.

Chajana: It is important. When I perform I’m trying to connect, but I can’t fully realize that connection until I digitally merge the two together. The upcoming WPA show is the first time my work has been reinserted into the setting in which they were created/conceived. In doing this, I feel that it somehow completes the process.

Blair: The notion that the process is completed by the work returning to the site of the performance seems to relate directly back to the importance of the physical environment in your work. What is the role of the physical environment in your work?

Chajana: The physical environment is my studio. For the most part I don’t think about what I’m going to interact with until I meet it. The physical environment is also my subject. The other day I had an idea to have people commission me to make portraits of them. I would follow them around and merge myself and themselves to their environment. Then once the work was merged, they could also hang it in the space where it was taken.”

Read the full interview here. To see more about the upcoming show at the WPA, Oneness, Shock and Return, click here.